Share this article

One of the things I enjoy most about the film industry is discovering that many of today's "new" ideas are often old ideas returning in a different form.


Over the weekend, I was reminded of that after reading two articles published just days apart.


The first described a collaboration between actor-director Gerald Fillmore, Spanish production company LyO Media, and financier Filmika Audiovisual to produce both English and Spanish language versions of each feature by filming every scene twice with the same cast, beginning with their first film, Face Love (Amor En Toda La Cara).


Almost simultaneously, Variety published a review of Los Vampires, a new film inspired by one of Hollywood's most fascinating production stories. In 1931, Universal Pictures tackled the challenge of international distribution by producing two versions of Dracula on the same sets. During the day, Tod Browning directed Bela Lugosi in the now iconic English-language version.


At night, a second production team used the same sets to film a separate Spanish-language version with a different director and cast. The approach reflected a challenge created by the arrival of sound. While silent films could be exported simply by replacing intertitles, spoken dialogue suddenly made language a commercial barrier. As dubbing technology improved, Hollywood largely abandoned multiple-language productions because dubbing became faster and less expensive.

Yet nearly a century later, filmmakers are once again exploring two version production models to reach audiences in different language markets. That raises an interesting question: Has the industry's solution really evolved, or are we still trying to solve the same problem in a different way?


For decades, international filmmakers seeking English speaking audiences have generally had four options: rely on subtitles, use traditional dubbing, produce an English language version from the outset, or sell remake rights. Each approach involves tradeoffs between cost, authenticity, audience reach, and creative control.


Today, advances in technology have made another model possible.


Instead of producing two separate films, filmmakers can preserve the original production while creating an additional language version from that same film. One production, one cast, and one creative vision can now serve multiple audiences and distribution strategies.


Adapt Entertainment recently applied this approach to The Champion, the Polish German World War II drama based on the true story of Auschwitz prisoner and boxer Tadeusz "Teddy" Pietrzykowski. The original language version remains unchanged, while a new English-language version is now available on Apple TV, Prime Video, Google TV, YouTube, Fandango, and other digital platforms.

For filmmakers, the implications extend well beyond distribution. Rather than choosing between cultural authenticity, awards eligibility, and broader audience reach, they may now be able to pursue all three. The original language version can continue serving domestic audiences, festivals, and awards consideration, while a separate language version makes the same film accessible to viewers who might otherwise never watch it because of subtitles or traditional dubbing.


Nearly a century after Universal filmed two versions of Dracula on the same sets, the film industry is still confronting the same fundamental question: How can one story cross language barriers without losing what made it powerful in the first place?

The next evolution in international filmmaking may not be creating two productions for two audiences but enabling one original production to connect with audiences around the world in multiple languages while preserving its original performances, story, and creative vision.


That is the principle behind Adapt Entertainment's approach: preserving the original language version for its existing audience while creating an additional language version that expands a film's reach to viewers who may never have watched it with subtitles or traditional dubbing.



If the past century was defined by finding new ways to tell stories across languages, the next may be defined by allowing one original film to reach a bigger audience without creating a second production.